skyline-2
Comptroller William C. Thompson, Jr.
 
 
  Press Office
 
Comptroller Navigation
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 printer friendlyPrint-Friendly 
PR03-10-082
October 9, 2003
Contact: Press Office
 
212-669-3747
THOMPSON AUDIT: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BOOKS CONTAIN NEARLY $300,000 IN QUESTIONABLE EXPENSES

Luxury Hotels, Parties, and Chevy Tahoes in Dispute

Agency Failed to Follow Reimbursement and Purchasing Guidelines

View Audit

New York City Comptroller William C. Thompson, Jr. today released an audit that questioned nearly 40 percent - close to $290,000 - of Economic Development Corporation (EDC) expenses reviewed, including everything from luxury hotel stays to a party for its president to improper car service use. The audit further noted that the EDC failed to comply with competitive bidding requirements, ignored purchasing and reimbursement guidelines, and paid $124,000 to a consultant without receiving specifics about its work.

"The Economic Development Corporation is responsible for attracting new business and helping commercial and industrial enterprises flourish in the city," Comptroller Thompson said. "I question whether all of the expenses incurred by the EDC meet that mission. Quite a few of them appear to be inappropriate for the corporation."

Thompson's audit examined whether reimbursements to EDC employees for "travel and out-of-pocket expenses" and other charges to its "Other General Expenses" account were in accordance with EDC's contracts with the City." The audit reflected only a portion of expenses, those of selected accounts within the EDC's ledger for its "Other General Expenses" account. Most of the audit period - July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2002 - covered the previous City Hall administration.

Founded in 1966, the EDC is a local development corporation that holds two contracts with the City. The EDC administers economic development programs relating to the attraction, retention, acquisition, rehabilitation, and improvement of industrial and commercial and enterprises.

The audit determined that the corporation complied with some of its policies for processing payments. However, auditors found a number of occasions in which the EDC did not maintain appropriate documentation to support expenses, follow its guidelines for awarding sole source contracts, obtain bids for procurements in accordance with its contracts with the City, and ensure that all payments to consultants were documented.

Specifically, the questionable expenses included:

  • $154,451 in purchases on behalf of the Mayor's Office and the Office of Management and Budget. These purchases included: $129,879 for three Chevy Tahoes and related accessories in March 2002; $6,000 for 100 engraved "keys to the City"; $5,200 for an alarm installed in the Mayor's Office; and $13,372 for hotel accommodations and meals in New York City for an official of the Office of Management and Budget.

  • $11,222 paid to the 14 Wall Street Restaurant for a dinner reception on January 23, 2002, from 6 to 8 p.m. The voucher did not receive the proper approvals.

  • $6,514 for lodging costs incurred on behalf of the four individuals for accommodations at the Hotel Giraffe from Sept. 19 to 25, 2001, without documentation to support the need to accommodate the guests or identify their business affiliation with the EDC.

  • $4,212 for mobile phones and pagers whose emergency use was not documented. EDC policy states that "cell phones should not be utilized except for emergency situations," although the definition of what constitutes an "emergency" is not specified.

  • $1,123 paid to Mrs. Java, LLC, for coffee refills for employees. (The audit further noted that the EDC paid Mrs. Java $27,265 during the two-year audit period.)

    In its response to the Comptroller's audit, the EDC still failed to include much of the details to justify the expenses. However, the corporation noted that it has "discontinued entirely" the practice of paying for outside employee events.

    Additionally, the audit found that the EDC awarded three "sole source" contracts totaling $40,624 without showing that reasonable efforts were made to find other vendors. These contracts were intended for a business trip to Korea and development for a venture capital conference. On at least four occasions, the EDC did not comply with competitive bidding requirements for contracting goods and services over $25,000. Further, the EDC made payments totaling $124,082 to one consultant for expenses that did not have supporting documentation.

    "The EDC's policies were intended to make sure that all of the expenses incurred were within its mission of promoting economic development in the City," Thompson said. "When reasonable efforts are not made to find other vendors and bidding requirements are not followed, we cannot be assured that the EDC has obtained the best value in the interest of the City and the taxpayers."

    Auditors also identified a number of car service expenses that flouted EDC policy. The audit noted 55 instances totaling $2,281 where the EDC paid for car service use by its employees outside the hours allowed under its policy.

    Auditors made 14 recommendations to the EDC, including:

  • Ensure that all expenses are reasonable, necessary, and in accordance with its contractual agreements with the City.

  • Sole Source agreements should be awarded in accordance with the Master and Maritime Contracts.

  • Engage in a bidding process and enter into formal contracts for purchases of goods and services exceeding $25,000.

  • Obtain all appropriate documentation, such as invoices, timesheets, receipts, and canceled checks, before approving payments to consultants; submit appropriate documentation for consulting contracts to the Deputy Mayor for approval.

  • Solicit bids for all purchases that exceed $2,500.

    In its response, the EDC agreed with many of the recommendations and indicated that a number are substantially incorporated into its policies and procedures. However, EDC officials took exception with certain of the audit's findings and recommendations claiming that the auditors misunderstood some of its policies and procedures.

    ###
  •  
     
     
    skyline footer

    Please note:

    Some files on this website require Adobe Reader. Some parts of this website are better viewed with Adobe Flash Player.

    The Comptroller : Reports : Bureaus : Press Office : Contact : Home
    Audits : Claim Forms : RFPs : FAQs : Labor Law : Links : Site Map : Disclaimer : Privacy Policy

    Copyright 2008, The New York City Comptroller’s Office

    Office of the Comptroller
    City of New York
    1 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007
    Phone: (212) 669-3500, Fax: (212) 669-2707