|
View
Recycling Letter (pdf)
[February 07, 2003]
View
Letter and Comments to the Mayoral and City Council Task Force on
Recycling (pdf)
[December 04, 2002 ]
New York City Comptroller William C. Thompson, Jr. today called
on the Department of Sanitation (DOS) to reinstate a full-scale
recycling program for New York City. The Comptroller states in his
letter to John Doherty, Commissioner of DOS, that with the new waste
export bid for Brooklyn, the Department’s rationale for suspending
the City’s glass and plastics recycling program no longer
exists.
“DOS justified its decision to suspend glass and plastic
recycling on the expectation that the City would save tens of millions
of dollars each year,” Comptroller Thompson said in the letter
to DOS. “It is now abundantly clear that merely recycling
metal and exporting glass and plastic as waste is more expensive
than recycling all of these materials.”
Comptroller Thompson’s request for a full-scale recycling
program comes shortly after DOS received new bids for exporting
waste from Brooklyn ranging from $75 to $82 per ton. Assuming DOS
chooses the lowest bidder, New York City’s average waste export
costs will rise from $66 to $69 dollars per ton. This saves the
City an average of only $1 per ton compared to the lowest bid of
$70 per ton to recycle metal, glass and plastic. Additionally, the
Comptroller found that the average waste export cost in Queens is
now $71 per ton and requires collection trucks to travel to New
Jersey to dispose of their refuse. The reinstatement of full-scale
recycling would allow Queens to recycle metal, glass and plastic
in the borough at a facility in Long Island City.
The Comptroller also points out that, since the suspension of glass
and plastic recycling, the City has seen a 12 percent decline in
paper recycling, resulting in a loss of revenue and increased waste
export costs to the City.
“The public’s confusion over the status of the recycling
program is one of the primary reasons paper recycling rates have
declined,” Comptroller Thompson said. “In these challenging
fiscal times, we can not afford to cut programs that bring revenue
to New York City, particularly one that will help preserve and protect
the City’s environment.”
Using DOS’s recycling diversion reports covering the first
quarter of Fiscal Year 2003, the Comptroller calculated that lower
paper recycling rates have cost the city more than $800,000 in lost
revenue and increased waste export expenses. If the City continues
to recycle 12 percent fewer tons of paper for the rest of the current
fiscal year, the cost will total approximately $3.4 million.
###
|