|
View
Report
New York City Comptroller William C. Thompson, Jr. today released
the results of a survey demonstrating a dramatic increase in commercial
insurance premiums coupled with a significant decline in the availability
of insurance since the September 11 attack on the World Trade Center.
The Comptroller's report, entitled "One Year Later: The Effects
of 9/11 on Commercial Insurance Rates and Availability in New York
City," surveyed agents and brokers serving businesses in New
York City.
"Insurance companies are taking advantage of New Yorkers,"
Comptroller Thompson said. "They are not helping the City right
now, and this is undermining our ability to retain and attract new
business. Once again, New Yorkers are being penalized."
The Comptroller's Office asked about changes in the price and availability
of nine lines of property and casualty coverage since September
11th, compared with the previous year. The survey determined that
New York City has experienced premium increases markedly higher
than those in the rest of the country after September 11th.
Businesses located in high-rise buildings in Manhattan, particularly
those in, or even near, landmark or "trophy" properties
considered by insurers to be at risk of becoming terrorist targets
had the greatest increases in premiums. Large sized accounts, with
premiums over $1,000,000, experienced an average 73.3% increase
per policy, while medium-sized accounts, those paying premiums between
$50,000 and $1,000,000, encountered an average increase of 49.5%,
and small-sized accounts, which pay premiums of less than $50,000,
an average 39% increase.
In a meeting with the Comptroller's Office, members of the Real
Estate Board of New York (REBNY),which includes many of the city's
largest policy-holders, described "serious" problems large
commercial tenants have experienced in obtaining affordable coverage.
The representative of one landmark property said that its property
insurance premium had increased almost 700% without terrorism coverage
for one-third of the property's value. Another reported he approached
25 insurers in the domestic and foreign property market, none of
whom was interested in insuring his portfolio of properties at any
price.
Thompson also expressed concerns about the effect of the increases
on small businesses.
"Many of these businesses may be at greater peril from rate
increases since they are least likely to have the resources to tolerate
significantly increased costs," he said. "New York State
does not allow insurers to exclude terrorism, so insurers are restricting
the coverage they will write, or drastically increasing rates to
protect themselves from potential catastrophic losses."
The Comptroller pointed out that September 11th was not the only
factor to trigger the increased premiums, and that insurance rates
already were on the rise before the attack. Higher than anticipated
losses and the economy, which already was slowing before the attack,
also contributed to rising prices and a tightening insurance market.
"Premiums rose sharply after the terrorist attack because
an additional factor came into play, namely a sense that risk exposures
were higher than previously estimated," the Comptroller said.
"New York businesses and residents are being asked to shoulder
a huge hidden tax burden through the dramatic increases in insurance
premiums levied following 9/11," said William C. Rudin, Chairman
of the Association for a Better New York and President of the Rudin
Management Company. "These increases unfairly target our city,
which has already suffered enough, and other urban centers across
America that are potential terrorist targets. We urge Congress to
return to Washington and pass legislation that will allow rates
to fall and bring normalcy back to these markets."
The survey discovered a "troubling" decline in the availability
of various types of commercial insurance after the attack. Agents
and brokers consistently struggled to locate coverage for companies
comparable to the previous year.
For large accounts, the percentage of respondents who reported
that coverage was either "readily available" or "somewhat
available" fell from 84.1% for the year before September 11th
to 20.2% for the year after the attack - a 63.9% difference. Medium-sized
accounts also showed a significant rise in scarcity, with 87.1%
of respondents finding coverage "readily" or "somewhat
available" before September 11th and only 28.0% making that
assessment afterward. Similarly, the number of respondents reporting
that coverage for small accounts was "readily" or "somewhat
available" decreased from 85.2% for the year before September
11th to 34.3% for the period after the attack.
Survey respondents reported fewer insurance companies are willing
to write additional business or renew existing business in New York
City, especially Manhattan, after September 11th. The insurance
lines most affected by the attack were business interruption, commercial
property, general liability, umbrella and excess liability and workers
compensation. Survey respondents also reported that:
· Premiums for business interruption increased by 51.7%
and commercial property premiums rose 74.4% after September 11th,
as compared with 7.0% and 10.3% in the previous year.
· Premiums for general liability coverage increased by 50.5%
following the attack, compared with a 10.9% increase the previous
year.
· Construction liability premiums increased by 101.6% since
September 11th - the highest average premium increase reported in
the survey. At the same time, survey respondents noted its availability
was very limited.
"Since last September's tragic attack, the soaring cost of
real property insurance and the declining availability of some kinds
of coverage, including the absence of terrorism insurance, have
posed increasingly serious risks to our city's economy," said
REBNY President Steven Spinola. "Since individuals, governments
and other entities across America are invested in high-value New
York buildings through their pension funds, insurance policies,
bank deposits and bonds, this situation calls for remedial action
to protect the nation's stake in these billions of dollars' worth
of real property.
Comptroller Thompson issued a series of recommendations to slow
the escalating rates:
Federal Terrorism Insurance. I fully support H.R. 5523 introduced
in the House of Representatives by Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney
and the New York City delegation and S. 3055 introduced in the Senate
by Senators Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer. These bills would
establish a backstop measure to provide temporary support in the
form of loans and or governmental reinsurance for insurance companies
writing terrorism insurance. This is important because such a proposal
might increase confidence in the insurance industry writing insurance
in New York City.
Expansion of Risk Financing Options. As an alternative to
purchasing insurance in the commercial market, large companies,
groups of companies or industry associations should consider establishing
alternative financing strategies, including purchasing groups, reciprocals,
other self insurance arrangements, and captive insurance companies.
The State Insurance Department should encourage expansion of these
alternatives, which will allow businesses to mitigate the effects
of price increases and supply shortages in the retail market.
New Insurance Companies. States that believe that insurance
premiums are too high or insufficiently available can encourage
the creation of new insurance companies. This has happened in many
states for the sale of workers' compensation and medical malpractice
insurance and should be considered in New York State in order to
create more capacity in the commercial insurance market.
Risk Reduction. Companies and local governments, including
New York City, are investing in physical improvements and in increased
coverage by security personnel to improve security and to reduce
risks. This effort should continue in the City so that local businesses
will become more attractive to insurers, which presumably will result
in lower premiums and greater availability.
|