| THOMPSON CALLS FOR MORE TRANSPARENCY AT NYC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
View Letter (pdf)
Comptroller Thompson recently presented a plan calling for the New York City Industrial Development Agency (NYCIDA) to increase transparency and accountability, to address concerns over the selection of program beneficiaries. As an agency board member, the Comptroller made his suggestions in a letter to Robert Lieber, Chairman of the NYCIDA and newly appointed Deputy Mayor for Economic Development.
Thompson recommended measures to allow the NYCIDA to improve transparency and efficiency in its communications with board members, improve the application process, and enhance public involvement. The letter is available at www.comptroller.nyc.gov.
“The benefits that the NYCIDA provides to businesses play a vital role in promoting economic development around the city,” Thompson said. “However, we must take steps to ensure that the companies benefiting from these programs meet standards for paying living wages and controlling energy costs. By setting clear guidelines, as well as implementing improved standards of transparency and accountability, the NYCIDA can take steps towards achieving these goals.”
The agency provides financing and incentive programs to encourage and assist companies and not-for-profit organizations to remain and grow in New York City. These programs include providing access to triple tax-exempt bond financing or tax benefits that companies can use to acquire or create capital assets.
In Fiscal Year 2007, the NYC IDA provided over $2.2 billion in tax-exempt bonds on behalf of beneficiaries. These bonds are often coupled with other incentives, such as forgiveness of mortgage recording taxes. The direct cost to taxpayers of all the deals struck in Fiscal Year 2007 ultimately will be $725 million.
Thompson noted that some specific beneficiaries, such as private schools and non-profit organizations, are forced to adhere to socially responsible compliance criteria for living wages and reducing energy consumption, while others are not.
“If non-profit and private school beneficiaries are required to be socially responsible, we can certainly ask the same of for-profit firms,” he added. |